Arrest may be accomplished with a warrant or warrantless; what is true?

Arrest may be accomplished with a warrant or warrantless; what is true?

• A. It requires no probable cause
• B. It must be based on a confession
• C. It can only occur with a warrant
• D. All of the above

Answer: (D)

Arrest can be carried out either with a warrant or without one. When an arrest is without a warrant, the officer must have probable cause to believe the person committed a crime; there are also limited exceptions (like exigent circumstances) that allow warrantless arrests. A confession by the suspect is not required to justify an arrest, though a confession can later be used as evidence of guilt. An arrest does not have to be made only with a warrant; there are valid warrantless arrests under the right conditions. So the idea that no probable cause is ever needed, that a confession is required, or that a warrant is mandatory in all cases isn’t accurate. The key point is that arrests may be done with a warrant or without one, depending on circumstances and probable cause.

Arrest can be carried out either with a warrant or without one. When an arrest is without a warrant, the officer must have probable cause to believe the person committed a crime; there are also limited exceptions (like exigent circumstances) that allow warrantless arrests. A confession by the suspect is not required to justify an arrest, though a confession can later be used as evidence of guilt. An arrest does not have to be made only with a warrant; there are valid warrantless arrests under the right conditions. So the idea that no probable cause is ever needed, that a confession is required, or that a warrant is mandatory in all cases isn’t accurate. The key point is that arrests may be done with a warrant or without one, depending on circumstances and probable cause.