The act described in the previous question results in which charge and liability?

The act described in the previous question results in which charge and liability?

• A. Infraction
• B. Misdemeanor with no liability for expenses
• C. Class 1 misdemeanor and defendant is liable for the expenses incurred in fighting the fire
• D. Felony and liable for all damages

Answer: (C)

When someone starts a fire in a way that is reckless or negligent, the act is treated as a Class 1 misdemeanor, which is a criminal offense of moderate seriousness. The law also makes the person financially responsible for the expenses incurred by firefighters in fighting that fire. This combination reflects both the criminal conduct and the practical consequence of the firefighting response. Infractions are too minor for starting a fire, and a felony would require a higher degree of intent or greater harm. Saying the person is liable for all damages goes beyond the statute, which specifically targets firefighting costs rather than all potential damages.

When someone starts a fire in a way that is reckless or negligent, the act is treated as a Class 1 misdemeanor, which is a criminal offense of moderate seriousness. The law also makes the person financially responsible for the expenses incurred by firefighters in fighting that fire. This combination reflects both the criminal conduct and the practical consequence of the firefighting response.

Infractions are too minor for starting a fire, and a felony would require a higher degree of intent or greater harm. Saying the person is liable for all damages goes beyond the statute, which specifically targets firefighting costs rather than all potential damages.